Category Archives: General

Microsoft issues Word patch

Microsoft issued a patch for its Word software to comply with a court ruling that it infringed on patents relating to the use of XML or extensible markup language in its flagship word processing software.

 

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word programmes containing the infringing code from Jan 11, 2010. It also upheld jury-imposed damages of $290 million.

The ruling came in an appeal by Microsoft against a Texas jury verdict last August that found Microsoft had violated patents owned by Canadian software company i4i Inc.

“A small company was practicing its patent, only to suffer a loss of market share, brand recognition and customer goodwill as the result of the defendant’s infringing acts,” the three-judge panel said in court documents.

“The district court found that Microsoft captured 80 percent of the custom XML market with its infringing Word products, forcing i4i to change its business strategy.”

The patch was made available to computer makers to install on new machines preloaded with the Word software and strips Word and other Office programs of custom XML editing capabilities which is used by companies to link their data to Word documents.

Microsoft Office, which includes Word, PowerPoint, and Excel is used by millions of businesses and consumers and accounted for more than $3 billion in worldwide sales in Microsoft’s most recent fiscal year.

Advertisement that will Make you Think

Your Decisions your Way ( Cieling of a Smoking Room)
Your Decisions your Way ( Cieling of a Smoking Room)
Chewing tobacco causes mouth cancer
Chewing tobacco causes mouth cancer
Drive safely
Drive safely
Protect children from online pornography
Protect children from online pornography

 

Child Abusive Awareness , Most child abuse is committed by the person a child and you trust.
Child Abusive Awareness , Most child abuse is committed by the person a child and you trust.

 

Save Girl Child
Save Girl Child

 

Feed the Children. The next time you waste food, think
Feed the Children. The next time you waste food, think

 

Encourage Adoption. Encourage Adoption
Encourage Adoption. Encourage Adoption

 

Save Girl Child. Dont neglect her everywhere.
Save Girl Child. Dont neglect her everywhere.

 

Parenting is by example. Children learn fast. Don't fight at home.
Parenting is by example. Children learn fast. Don't fight at home.
Stop Domestic Violence. 78% of domestic abuse incidents resulting in death occur in the victim's home
Stop Domestic Violence. 78% of domestic abuse incidents resulting in death occur in the victim's home

 

Stop Racism.Defend human rights against racial discrimination
Stop Racism.Defend human rights against racial discrimination

Feel like blogging? Blog with us!

http://smartlifeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/99designs-crowdsource.jpgIf you always wanted to have a blog but didn’t wanted to go through the hassles of maintaining one? Do you feel like you want to contribute to our blog? We welcome all our reader to post on our blog. Please register with us and post on the blog. Dont forget to fill in the Bio info on your profile page after registering.
For those of you new to wordpress follow this short tutorial to learn how to post, just in few minutes.
<?php edit_post_link(__("**Edit**"), ''); ?>

One more among us…

Aditya Aima

Aditya Aima… A inquisitive guy… asks hell lot questions… cares for the world… and writes what he feels… Thus he is here with us…
I met him in my MBA class… liked his questions… liked what he opined… And we have him here to express himself for us all.

Funny interpretations of Boss oneliners!!!

1. When your boss says – “You have screwed up this module”

Smile – it means “the other modules were good”

2. When your boss says – “I am not going to let you go early today evening”

Smile – It means “you can come late tomorrow”

3. When your boss says – “Do the documentation”

Smile – it means “Relax dude, you’ve done enough of coding, time to give your brains a break”

4. When your boss says – “You do nothing but just surf the internet”

Smile – it means “Dude, now I know where all that knowledge comes from”

5. When your boss says – “Do you come to office to sleep?”

Smile – It means “hey buddy, why do you stress yourself? Have a good night’s sleep and come to office whenever you wish!”

6 . When your boss says – “Stop staring at that girl you moron”

Smile – it means “My wife is better than her ”

7. When your boss says – “Why does nothing work on your machine?”

Smile – it means “I am thinking I could rather give you my laptop”

8. When your boss says – “Would you stop talking on your mobile phone?”

Smile – it means “Use the office phone instead”

9. When your boss says – “Why do you keep smiling always?”

Smile – it means “I love the fact that You are spreading the good will”

10. When your boss says – “YOU ARE FIRED”

SLAP HIM IN HIS FACE AND SAY – “I RESIGN

Tax Structure in India…. Funny But True…

 Tax Structure in India…. Funny But True…
 
Question 1. : What are you doing?
Ans. : Business.
Tax : PAY PROFESSIONAL TAX!
Question 2 : What are you doing in Business?
Ans. : Selling the Goods.
Tax : PAY SALES TAX!!

Question 3 : From where are you getting Goods?
Ans. : From other State/Abroad
Tax : PAY CENTRAL SALES TAX, CUSTOM DUTY & OCTROI!

Question 4 : What are you getting in Selling Goods?
Ans. : Profit.
Tax : PAY INCOME TAX!

Question 5: How do you distribute profit ?
Ans : By way of dividend
Tax : PAY DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION TAX

Question 6 : Where you Manufacturing the Goods?
Ans. : Factory.
Tax : PAY EXCISE DUTY!

Question 7 : Do you have Office / Warehouse / Factory?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY MUNICIPAL & FIRE TAX!

Question 8 : Do you have Staff?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY STAFF PROFESSIONAL TAX!

Question 9 : Doing business in Millions?
Ans. : Yes  — Tax : PAY TURNOVER TAX!
Ans : No — Tax : Then pay Minimum Alternate Tax
Question 10 : Are you taking out over 25,000 Cash from Bank?
Ans. : Yes, for Salary.
Tax : PAY CASH HANDLING TAX!

Question 11 : Where are you taking your client for Lunch & Dinner?
Ans. : Hotel
Tax : PAY FOOD & ENTERTAINMENT TAX!

Question 12 : Are you going Out of Station for Business?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY FRINGE BENEFIT TAX!

Question 13 : Have you taken or given any Service / (s)?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY SERVICE TAX!

Question 14 : How come you got such a Big Amount?
Ans. : Gift on birthday.
Tax : PAY GIFT TAX!

Question 15.: Do you have any Wealth?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY WEALTH TAX!

Question 16 : To reduce Tension, for entertainment, where are you going?
Ans. : Cinema or Resort.
Tax : PAY ENTERTAINMENT TAX!

Question 17 : Have you purchased House?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY STAMP DUTY & REGISTRATION FEE !

Question 18 : How you Travel?
Ans. : Bus
Tax : PAY SURCHARGE!

Question 19.: Any Additional Tax?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY EDUCATIONAL, ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL & SURCHARGE ON ALL THE CENTRAL GOVT.’s TAX !!!

 

Question 20: Delayed any time Paying Any Tax?
Ans. : Yes
Tax : PAY INTEREST & PENALTY!

21) INDIAN : Can I die now??
Ans :: Wait we are about to launch the funeral tax !!!
Tax Structure in India……. Funny But True

Close Encounter 101 Illustrated

http://www.clker.com/cliparts/0/2/2/6/1195422901997731207liftarn_Warning_for_aliens.svg.hi.png

A close encounter in ufology is an event where a person witnesses an unidentified flying object. This terminology and the system of classification behind it was started by astronomer and UFO researcher J. Allen Hynek, and was first suggested in his 1972 book The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry.He introduced the first three kinds of encounters; more sub-types of close encounters were later added by others, but these additional categories are not universally accepted by UFO researchers, mainly because they depart from the scientific rigor that Hynek aimed to bring to ufology.
Sightings more than 500 feet (160 m) from the witness are classified as “Daylight Discs,” “Nocturnal Lights,” or “Radar/Visual Reports.” Sightings within about 500 feet are subclassified as various types of “close encounter.” Hynek and others argued a claimed close encounter must occur within about 500 feet to greatly reduce or eliminate the possibility of misidentifying conventional aircraft or other known phenomena.

http://rlv.zcache.com/postcard_aliens_hi_im_bob-p239887518058507165qibm_400.jpg

Close Encounter of the First kind
A sighting of one or more unidentified flying objects:

* Flying saucers
* Odd lights

* Aerial objects that are not attributable to known human technology
http://londonist.com/attachments/sizemore/ufo_london.jpg

Close Encounter of the Second kind
An observation of a UFO, and associated physical effects from the UFO, including:

* Heat or radiation
* Damage to terrain
* Human paralysis (Catalepsy)
* Frightened animals
* Interference with engines or TV or radio reception.
* Lost Time: a gap in one’s memory associated with a UFO encounter.

Close Encounter of the Third kind
An observation of what Hynek termed “animate beings” observed in association with a UFO sighting. Hynek deliberately chose the somewhat vague term “animate beings” to describe beings associated with UFOs without making any unfounded assumptions regarding the beings’ origins or nature. Hynek did not necessarily regard these beings as “extraterrestrials” or “aliens.” Additionally, Hynek further expressed discomfort with such reports, but felt a scientific obligation to include them, at the very least because they represented a sizable minority of claimed UFO encounters.
[edit] Bloecher subtypes

The UFO researcher Ted Bloecher proposed seven subtypes for the close encounters of the third kind in the Hynek’s scale.

A: An entity is observed only inside the UFO
B: An entity is observed inside and outside the UFO
C: An entity is observed near to a UFO, but not going in or out.
D: An entity is observed. No UFOs are seen by the observer, but UFO activity has been reported in the area at about the same time
E: An entity is observed. But no UFOs are seen and no UFO activity has been reported in the area at that time
F: No entity or UFOs are observed, but the subject experiences some kind of “intelligent communication”.
http://thecia.com.au/reviews/c/images/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind-4.jpg

Close Encounter of the Fourth kind
A human is abducted by a UFO or its occupants. This type was not included in Hynek’s original close encounters scale.

Jacques Vallee, Hynek’s erstwhile associate, argued that a CE4 should be described as “cases when witnesses experienced a transformation of their sense of reality,” so as to also include non-abduction cases where absurd, hallucinatory or dreamlike events are associated with UFO encounters.

Also in some cases, The Fourth Kind is described as being in the presence or under possession. Described in various UFO abduction cases as the most fearful experience of any.. the presence, not true visibility, but the realm, or sense of their presence.

http://blogs.amctv.com/scifi-scanner/the-fourth-kind-1.jpg

Close Encounter of the Fifth kind
Named by Steven M. Greer’s CSETI group, these purported encounters are joint, bilateral contact events produced through the conscious, voluntary and proactive human-initiated or cooperative communication with Extraterrestrial intelligence. This is very similar to some “contactees” of the 1950s who claimed regular communication with benevolent aliens.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41V5BXNESEL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
Close Encounter of the Sixth kind
On Michael Naisbitt’s website, a sixth proposed CE scenario is described as UFO incidents that cause direct injury or death. This category was not included in Hynek’s scale, and is furthermore redundant: a CE2 in Hynek’s scale specifically included UFO encounters that leave direct physical evidence of any kind.

Close Encounter of the Seventh kind
The Black Vault Encyclopedia Project proposes a Close Encounter of the Seventh Kind as human-alien hybridisation. This concept similar to ideas promoted by ancient astronauts theorists like Erich von Däniken, Zecharia Sitchin and Robert K.G. Temple, in that extraterrestrials interacted with, perhaps interbred with and influenced ancient human beings in the past.
This concept of CE7 is at odds with Hynek’s original concepts, however. Hynek’s CE3 specifically avoided describing UFO occupants as “aliens” or “extraterrestrials,” contending that there was not enough evidence to determine if beings associated with UFOs had an objective physical reality, let alone to confirm their origins or motives.